If the theory of intelligent design is really the more accurate theory. That is, if all this information and the test are true; then why hasn't this been reported like all other scientific discoveries have?
Why hasn't this theory replaced the more flawed Theory of Evolution? Why don't teachers teach this along with other truths about reality (like an Atom's composition, Newton's laws of motion, the way D.N.A. works, ect.)? Why don't we hear about it on documentaries?
In mainstream science, we really hear no mention of this (infact it would be hard to hear any mention at all of the theory of intelligent design), instead we see the opposite: The Theory of Evolution is potrayed as not only the most accurate origin theory but also as the absolute undenable truth about where everything came from.
So the question here is about this clear contradiction between the scientific community and what we have tested here:
Are we missing something is this test? Does this make our conclusions wrong? Or is something else going on?
Come to find out, there have been many scientists who have not only scientifically proven Intelligent design as a more accurat theory better explaining where eveything came from but also exposes very serious scientific flaws with many major parts of the theory of evolution.
So there are many scientists who have come to the same conclusions in many of the same ways this test on this site has, and if what their saying is true (and it seems to be very scientifically sound) then there is very real and major problems with the theory of evolution; why hasn't this revolutionized Science? This should be one of the biggest revolutions to ever happen in science!
So what is going on?
Well suprizingly, It turns out the answer is something much stranger than any conspiracy theory known: and worst of all it seems to be 100% true and has been happening for over 100 years at this point! the answer is the scientific community seems to be biased against anything proving the theory of intelligent design as true. :
Here are three examples of this happening to scientists who discover something that supports the theory of intelligent design (and also shows major flaws in evolution). In these examples we can see this biased and even outright hostile/aggresive nature of the main scientific community against these scientists and their findings; exposing the biased nature of the scientific community when it comes to intelligent design.
Dr. James Tour's findings on Chemical evolution
The first example is organic chemist Dr. James Tour; During his studies he decided to study specifically how life was though to have formed from non-life (also known as chemical evolution or abiogenesis): so he studied all there was on the subject and found very serious problems with chemical evolution:
With what he knew about chemical interactions (which was alot) in having to form a single cell (like the theory of evolution states had to have happened) he saw it could not have happen with how chemicals behaved and interacted with one another in this specific scenario.
His conclusion (if true: and so far it seems to definitively be) should have revolutionized this branch of science: Yet ,according to him, the exact opposite happened:
Instead he was mocked, ignored, and ,in general, given trouble by the scientific community. Many of them didn't want to reason scientifically (finding the truth) with James Tour's findings, rather, they just want to discredit him by labeling him a 'creationists' (thinking he supports intelligent design with his conclusion: eventhough that originally had nothing to do with his original conclusion).
Oh also, it important to note here Creationism (or the theory of intellgent design) is used as a type of insult in the scientific community to discredit someone; further confirming the clear bias scientists have with the theory of intelligent design.
What does all this have to do with the questions this scientist presented? What does this have to do with organic chemistry concerning chemical evolution?
Nothing!
In reality, they probably didn't like what he's saying/what the evidence is leading to and childishly name-called him (just like a child would do to 'get the upper hand' in an argument) :
However name calling is NOT science (nor even professional, at that): as said before, science is all about finding the truth: nothing more or nothing less if you personally don't like where the tests/conclusions lead that's your personal problem it does not (nor should not) change the fact of what the truth is, as science has found it.
However, this truth didn't stop the scientific community from ignoring his paper: and he wasn't the first one to realize this error in chemical evolution/abiogenisis: he stated that ,just like him, many other scientist had been publishing paper about the same errors mainstream scientists proposed happened to had form life since the 1980's!:
"people say 'why don't you publish papers saying that (about chemical evolution being impossible)?' and absolute I have, I have published 5 papers in the past in the field. They ignore them...So they just keep ignoring all of these sciences that people throw out roadblocks...people have been writing books about this since the 1980's...and they are utterly ignored...The general public is totally clueless on this and mislead." [1A]
Let that sink in: perfectly logical and scientifically sound papers that credible scientists have published have BEEN PURPOSELY IGNORED by the scientific community for almost 30 years now! Even today Dr.James Tour continues to spread this truth he has founded and has even stated if his conclusion is proven wrong (if it can be scientifically proven Chemical evolution can happen) he will take back all his work he has done and agree with them.[1B]
But so far, (that the author knows of) no one can accurately and scientifically prove his conclusion wrong.[1C]
Further supporting his conclusion as very accurate: yet it's still mocked and virtually ignored in mainstream science as scientists continue to propose chemical evolution is not only scientifically possible but pretty much did happen!
I bet you have never heard about chemical evolution being virtually impossible according to known chemistry; infact you probably hear about how it could not only happen but it has happened as an absolute fact and even breakthroughs that show how it happened!
It seems someone is clearly lying and it doesn't seem to be scientists like Dr. James Tour
Dr. Michale Behe's findings on irreducible complexity
Biochemist professor Dr. Michale Behe began to notice in his studies on organic life ,and especially its' cellular functions, how complex and interconnected they are. The more he realized how complex and interconnected they were, the harder it became to believe that all of it evolved by random natural chance.
Around 1995 A.D. this observation became undeniable as he studied a bacteria with a flagellum: he was amazed how something so complex and interconnect could have randomly evolved, but he was still assured someone in the scientific community knew how such a complex thing evolved.
After all, if evolution is such a sure proven theory someone would surely hae an idea, right?
So, he went to other scientists and tried to figure this out and come to find out nobody truly had a logical answer to how this could have evolved. At this point, Behe then began to study evolution closer and to try to find an answer himself:
Evolution stated these systems needed to evolve step by step but Behe saw some of these parts didn't look like they could have formed like this simply because they needed all their parts to work ,if they didn't work, according to the evolutionary theory; this would be an 'undesirable trait' and be very unlikely to pass onto the next generation: in other words, systems like a bacteria's flagellum should not exists:
yet they do.
Dr. Behe realized these system were 'irreducibly complex': this pointed to evolution being impossible and suggested instead this was evidence of design and thus supported the theory of intelligent design as a more accurate reason for their existence.
So, he published a paper about this revolutionary discovery; truly this discovery in the 1990's should have revolutionized the process of evolution and even the theory of origin itself.
But instead he was accused of trying to 'promoting religion' (by suggesting intelligent design/creationism is true is considered trying to promote traditional religions) why admittedly he was a Roman Catholic that was NOT the reason he concluded this; but rather it was based off of only scientific observations and logic: therefore this accusation was false. Many other scientists tried to disprove this conclusion stating that it was possible the flagellum could have evolved naturally and was not impossible. However, their conclusions were reviwed by Dr.Behe as a possible explanation but found out to be also flawed and highly unlikely to have evolved from another proposed organelle.
These scientists eventually did not settle this debate by talking out their findings with Behe in a lab but rather taking him to court in a legal battle for his research in 2004 A.D. . In this case, the false evidence of the flagellum was presented and it seems this judge did not even consider Behe's findings on the subject. It was (very unscientifically) concluded Dr. Behe's conclusion was not only wrong but also the entire theory of intelligent design was NOT science!
Now as stated before, the whole point of science is to search for truth of reality. So this judge is basically rulling The theory of intelligent design is not true solely based on what seems like a faulty suggestion of how a bacteria's flagellum could have evolved that can be proven false.
Now if all this is true (and Dr. Behe's conclusion is right, as it seems to be) then the judge LIED and WRONGFULLY judged intelligent design as false (not to mention the scientific community approved of this rulling as scientifically accurate), when infact the evidence is still showing its' true, without any futher investigation! Once again this is NOT how proper science works!
However, this didn't stop the rulling that caused deep discredit to Dr.Behe. It caused him to be seen as a 'quack' and his work a false conclusion and as an example of another failed reason why Intelligent design is not true.
Even 25 years later (as far as the author can tell) his conclusion has still not been accurately disproven eventhough its been potrayed as that for over 25 years by the scientific community! [2]
Dr. Robert Gentry's discovery of Radio halos (among many other things)
Nuclear physicist Dr. Robert Gentry, discovered polonium halos in Earth's rock in the 1980's A.D.. His discovery of them was a breakthrough, it at first made the scientific community very interested. However, that all changed once they realized the implications of his finding:
That his work concluded Earth cooled down and hardened almost instantly (in the span of less than 5 minutes) thus proving The Nebular Theory (and the theory of evolution as a whole) had serious flaws (if not totally false) and instead suggested something intentionally cooled down the Earth in that span of time (hinting at an intelligent designer since nothing natural would likely cause that).
Once the scientific community realized these implications they ,in general, ignored the significance of his work and even later tried to get rid of his work and censor it for little to no reason:
His work should have changed text books, it should have changed the nebular theory, or even just Earth's origins, but instead it has been ignored and suppressed for over 30 years at this point, as the scientific community continues to say Earth's long hot formation and the nebular theory is 100% true. [3]
There are ,very likely, many more examples like this: there ARE REAL PROVABLE problems with the theory of evolution that are just ignored, misrepresented, even oppressed. You should be aware that this is why you don't hear of intelligent design replacing evolution; despite it being very scientifically accurate.
Thus, this is evidence there is very real (and un-scientific) bias in the mainstream scientific community against anything that ultimately questions the traditional theory of evolution as false and especially suggests the theory of intelligent design is really the true theory (thus proof of [a] God[s]/supreme being[s] existence).
Unlike the flat Earth theory's conspiracy, which can be officially and scientifically proven false, this seems to be a real scientific conspiracy! Whether the scientific community consciouslly realizes it or not, it is purposefully keeping very revolutionary scientific observations and conclusion hidden which is the very definition of a conspiracy.
(to be continued)
The sad truth is, you have/are being lied to in school, work, news, and society by scientists who biasly promote the theory of evolution to the general public as a fact :
Contrary to the scientific laws/observations other scientists have discovered:
This means there is VERY REAL and VERY STRONG evidence for the theory of intellgent design being the truth (thus the tests on this site are still very accurate).
There are very real problems with the theory of evolution making it not only improbable but also basically impossible (despite how the main scientific community potrays it as).
There are many scientists talking and publishing about this; but the problem is they are just ignored, attacked, or/and discredited by the main scientific community.
This is a terrible shame and heresy against science, yet there is strong proof this is what's happening concerning origin theories. But this perfectly explains WHY this theory is not replacing the theory of evolution: not because it's not scientific (truthful) or unknown rather there real biase against this theory because of the massive implications it would bring.
We have to look for the truth outselves using the scientific method and real sound scientific conclusions:
Because THIS is probably the most important question you could ever answer andyou owe it to yourself and family to know the real truth!
Sources:
[1]
[A]
(Quote from 27:28-28:27)
Youtube.com "We Have Been LIED TO About The Origin Of Life (Organic Chemist Speaks Out) | DDOW Podcast #01" by Daily Dose Of Wisdom on Sep 8, 2023
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAwwsewPxUs&list=PLJssdTFAF7sx2YSmpaJ-T-e8B7LGJraCh&index=19&t=0s
[B]
Youtube.com "Can Scientists Answer These Questions? RNA, Abiogenesis, Chemical Natural Selection & more" by Dr. James Tour on August 24 2023
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmykRoelTzU
[C]
(though this video is about 2 years old at the time of writing this, it seems this conclusion is still correct)
Youtube.com "Origin of Life Challenge RESULTS + HUGE announcement w/ Lee Cronin & James Tour | Evolution of Life" by Dr. James Tour on November 7 2023
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdR-ZmdFOcg
[2]
Youtube.com "Documentary Revolutionary, Michael Behe and the Mystery of Molecular Machines" By Skakvac on Sep 12, 2017
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fyd4CfYfVCA
[3]
[A]
Earth Science Associates; Polonium Halos: Unrefuted Evidence for Earth's Instant Creation! "Fingerprints of Creation" on 2019, 24246 Paulson Dr. Loma Linda, CA 92354
Video:
https://www.halos.com/videos/0001-FingerprintsofCreationEnglish.htm
[B]
"The Orion foundation" home
Website: